I don’t understand this Social Science question and need help to study.

Firstly read these 2 articles I have attached below which are by Anestis and Carbonell (2014) and Snedker (2015) on mental health courts. Familiarize yourself with how the authors organized their work. In today’s discussion, I would like you to think about the content of the articles. What aspect about the arguments put forward by Anestis and Carbonell (2014) and/or Snedker (2015) peaked your curiosity? What grabbed you? What did you find yourself agreeing with? Disagreeing with? Wanting to know more about? Did a question or puzzle emerge for you about the arguments? These issues might be about the content, conclusions, or the methodology.

*Answer those questions I have on the top.

Then After Write a small paragraph describing this curiosity, As part of this reflection, please find 2 peer-reviewed journal articles related to these topics, using them to help think about these issues.

for the questions only use the 2 articles i have below. then find 2 peer reviewed journal articles related to the topics.