I need an explanation for this Political Science question to help me study.



Rule Proposal: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2019-N-…

Comments Docket: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=FDA-2019-N-14…

For this assignment, you will be writing a formal, argumentative report that weighs your rules evidence and public comments. Prepare a five-paragraph analytical argument for why the agency should either adopt or reject the proposal.You must include arguments or evidence from three different comments supporting or rejecting the proposal.

– Length: 2 pages (2.5 pages max—try to keep it to 2, though, doesn’t include reference).

– Format: Single-spaced, double-spacing between paragraphs. Five paragraphs. APA format—dont forget in-text citations and a works cited page.

– Purpose: To argue for or against your rule (or how to revise it).

When constructing your arguments, think in these terms: Claim, Counterargument, Rebuttal.

Claim: This is the argument, the position, you are advancing.

– Counterargument: This is what you could imagine the best opposing argument to your claim could be.

– Rebuttal: This is where you acknowledge the merits of the opposing side, but quickly move to say why your position is not only superior but also why the counterclaim is flawed.



Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

× How can I help you?